Supreme Court rulings expose Democrats as half-baked hysterics


When President Donald Trump appointed Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court last fall, hysterical Democrats said millions of Americans would lose health coverage with his vote against ObamaCare – and immediately started talking about the creation of ‘a tribunal they described as hopelessly divided.

Two major Supreme Court rulings last week proved that reality was nothing like Dems’ feverish dreams.

In a 7-2 decision in California v. Texas High Court rejected a Republican offer to strike down ObamaCare – and Barrett was do not one of the two dissidents. He ruled that Texas and 17 other GOP-led states lacked standing to challenge the law’s individual mandate. The Trump administration had taken its side, while 20 Democratic-led states, including New York and California, as well as the Dem-controlled House of Representatives, took the other. Only Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch disagreed with the majority opinion of liberal Stephen Breyer.

How could it be? Last year, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said, “Confirming Amy Coney Barrett will be the end of the Affordable Care Act.” In his opening statement at Barrett’s confirmation of charges hearing, So-Sen. Kamala Harris held up a photo of an 11-year-old voter and accused Republicans of trying to “pass a Supreme Court candidate who will take healthcare away from millions of people during a deadly pandemic.”

Democrats boycotted the committee’s final vote, filling their seats in place of posters of ObamaCare beneficiaries, implying a vote for Barrett would put those lives at risk.

Throughout the childish circus, they insisted that Trump picked Barrett and rushed her confirmation just so she was seated in time to hear the arguments in the case and dismantle the law. They didn’t bother to look at his case file and examine his forensic philosophy – they assumed this skilled woman would be the president’s puppet.

In the second landmark decision, Fulton v. The Philadelphia court unanimously ruled that the city violated the Constitution’s free exercise clause by suspending Catholic Social Services’ contract because the group would not certify same-sex couples as foster parents.

Yes, all nine judges have ruled in favor of religious freedom – putting an end to complaints from Democrats, court is unbalanced with too many conservatives. It is far from being the only unanimous decision already in this legislature. Each judge signed rulings written by Gorsuch, Breyer, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor, with two of the cases involving immigration issues.

It should come as no surprise that people of various political stripes can agree on the law. Supreme Court justices take their jobs seriously – which is more than you can say for the Democrats tasked with helping them choose them.

Source link


About Author

Comments are closed.